|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
  |
Reports:
Bus subsidy simulation studyAppendix D: Profit Maximising Positions
This study has considered the incentive effects of the switch from FDR to a inactive
IPP. In order to consider incentives it is necessary to consider the objectives of the
organisations - in this case, the bus companies - that are facing the incentives.
We have done this by considering how IPP would move the operator away from their
existing position - the crucial feature is the direction and strength of the move. In
order to assess the strength of the incentive we have to find the point at which the
firm would be maximising profits, either subject to a constraint such as fare or
frequency fixed, or with fare, frequency and service quality all variable. From this
point, we can then assess the strength of the move.
This Appendix provides the background to the discussion in Section 4.4 of the main
text of the report. In Section 4.4 of the main report we indicated the "Day 1" change
in profit maximising position starting, not as in Section 4.3 with the present profitmaximising
position, but with profit-maximising positions predicted by our model
under different constraints. In this Appendix we provide some additional background
on those profit maximising positions.
It should be stressed that the key result is the extent to which profits increase once
the operator changes its behaviour in response to the change in subsidy regime, and
hence the extent to which this causes the operator to reduce fare and change
frequency and service quality, so as to increase the demand for bus services.
Figure D.1 shows the situation where the operator is free to change fare, frequency
and service quality. Figure D.2 shows the situation where fare is fixed. Figure D.3
shows the situation where frequency is fixed. Figure D.4 shows a comparison of the
per cent change in profits for each route under each of these three situations. In
general, the operators can best increase profits when they are free to vary all
variables. However, if frequency is fixed (and it may well be relatively "sticky" in
practice because frequency is not normally continuously variable), then the firm's
profit-maximising profitability is in most (but not all) cases not strongly reduced. If
fares are fixed, then the opportunity for the firm to increase profits from the initial,
"Day 1", position is much reduced - and in this case where fares do not fall the
switch from FDR to IPP will not have its main incentive effect. On the other hand,
with frequencies fixed, but fares falling, the incentive effect of a fall in fares is
reinforced with all the services which actually become less profitable with the subsidy
switch.
Tables D.1, D.2 and D.3 below contain, respectively, the impact without constraints,
the impact with fares constrained at their present level and the impact with frequency
constrained at its present level. For each analysis and route, the following is shown:
- Fares, frequency, quality, demand and profit under the current (FDR) position.
- The current (FDR) profit-maximising combination of fares, frequency, quality,
demand and profit.
- The Day 1 impact on profits of a move from FDR to IPP. Only profits change in
the Day 1 impact as the operator has not yet adjusted fares and service levels.
- The profit-maximising combination of fares, frequency, quality, demand and
profit under a per-passenger subsidy.
Table D.1: Detailed Modelled Operator Response - No Constraints
| Average revenue per passenger | Frequency (buses per hour) | Quality level | Passengers | Profit |
| Busy urban 1 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.63 |
8.0 |
1.50 |
256919 |
£50,364 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.80 |
6.1 |
2.69 |
190030 |
£66,087 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.80 |
6.1 |
2.69 |
190030 |
£75,104 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.76 |
6.4 |
2.75 |
207013 |
£75,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy urban 2 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.93 |
6.0 |
1.50 |
51583 |
3108 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.17 |
4.2 |
1.74 |
32944 |
8080 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.17 |
4.2 |
1.74 |
32944 |
8060 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.14 |
4.1 |
1.75 |
33780 |
8098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Medium urban |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.90 |
3.0 |
1.50 |
37978 |
2983 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.11 |
2.1 |
1.62 |
24667 |
6077 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.11 |
2.1 |
1.62 |
24667 |
6077 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.08 |
2.2 |
1.64 |
25935 |
6807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marginal urban |
Current position (FDR) |
£1.02 |
5.0 |
1.00 |
31238 |
-£2,957 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.36 |
3.0 |
1.63 |
17495 |
£3,806 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.36 |
3.0 |
1.63 |
17495 |
£3,064 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.34 |
2.9 |
1.62 |
17295 |
£3,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy interurban 1 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.86 |
1.0 |
1.00 |
43812 |
£4,457 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.03 |
0.9 |
1.86 |
36364 |
£7,326 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.03 |
0.9 |
1.86 |
36364 |
£6,013 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.01 |
0.9 |
1.86 |
36376 |
£6,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy interurban 2 |
Current position (FDR) |
£1.23 |
2.0 |
1.00 |
67888 |
£26,299 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.43 |
2.2 |
2.45 |
68363 |
£33,927 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.43 |
2.2 |
2.45 |
68363 |
£29,434 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.42 |
2.1 |
2.44 |
67136 |
£29,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marginal interurban |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.82 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
59465 |
£1,223 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.95 |
1.7 |
1.93 |
44574 |
£3,127 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.95 |
1.7 |
1.93 |
44574 |
£2,437 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.92 |
1.7 |
1.94 |
45777 |
£2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loss-making interurban |
Current position (FDR) |
£2.28 |
1.0 |
1.50 |
9334 |
-£3,989 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£2.72 |
0.7 |
1.55 |
5921 |
-£2,000 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£2.72 |
0.7 |
1.55 |
5921 |
-£4,854 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£2.66 |
0.6 |
1.51 |
5162 |
-£4,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rural |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.88 |
1.0 |
2.00 |
19206 |
£3,170 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.01 |
0.8 |
1.52 |
14117 |
£4,221 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.01 |
0.8 |
1.52 |
14117 |
£3,895 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.98 |
0.8 |
1.53 |
14398 |
£3,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table D.2: Detailed Modelled Operator Response - Fares Constrained at Present Level
| Average revenue per passenger | Frequency (buses per hour) | Quality level | Passengers | Profit |
| Busy urban 1 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.63 |
8.0 |
1.50 |
256919 |
£50,364 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.63 |
7.5 |
2.39 |
265967 |
£54,943 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.63 |
7.5 |
2.39 |
265967 |
£68,492 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.63 |
7.6 |
2.55 |
269966 |
£68,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy urban 2 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.93 |
6.0 |
1.50 |
51583 |
3108 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.93 |
4.6 |
1.44 |
44308 |
4747 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.93 |
4.6 |
1.44 |
44308 |
5179 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.93 |
4.6 |
1.46 |
44440 |
5180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Medium urban |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.90 |
3.0 |
1.50 |
37978 |
2983 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.90 |
2.3 |
1.41 |
32605 |
4032 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.90 |
2.3 |
1.41 |
32605 |
5185 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.90 |
2.4 |
1.45 |
33324 |
5196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marginal urban |
Current position (FDR) |
£1.02 |
5.0 |
1.00 |
31238 |
-£2,957 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.02 |
1.8 |
1.27 |
13130 |
£311 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.02 |
1.8 |
1.27 |
13130 |
-£83 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.02 |
1.8 |
1.28 |
12819 |
-£80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy interurban 1 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.86 |
1.0 |
1.00 |
43812 |
£4,457 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.86 |
1.0 |
1.64 |
45188 |
£5,516 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.86 |
1.0 |
1.64 |
45188 |
£4,506 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.86 |
0.9 |
1.63 |
43814 |
£4,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy interurban 2 |
Current position (FDR) |
£1.23 |
2.0 |
1.00 |
67888 |
£26,299 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.23 |
2.4 |
2.31 |
82978 |
£31,300 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.23 |
2.4 |
2.31 |
82978 |
£26,965 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.23 |
2.3 |
2.27 |
80721 |
£27,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marginal interurban |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.82 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
59465 |
£1,223 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.82 |
1.7 |
1.73 |
51063 |
£1,831 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.82 |
1.7 |
1.73 |
51063 |
£1,644 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.82 |
1.7 |
1.77 |
50788 |
£1,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loss-making interurban |
Current position (FDR) |
£2.28 |
1.0 |
1.50 |
9334 |
-£3,989 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£2.28 |
0.7 |
1.41 |
6170 |
-£2,675 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£2.28 |
0.7 |
1.41 |
6170 |
-£5,262 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£2.28 |
0.6 |
1.41 |
5026 |
-£5,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rural |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.88 |
1.0 |
2.00 |
19206 |
£3,170 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.88 |
0.9 |
1.45 |
16366 |
£3,859 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.88 |
0.9 |
1.45 |
16366 |
£3,684 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.88 |
0.8 |
1.46 |
16096 |
£3,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table D.3: Detailed Modelled Operator Response - Frequency Constrained at Current Level
| Average revenue per passenger | Frequency (buses per hour) | Quality level | Passengers | Profit |
| Busy urban 1 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.63 |
8.0 |
1.50 |
256919 |
£50,364 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.74 |
8.0 |
2.83 |
232310 |
£60,705 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.74 |
8.0 |
2.83 |
232310 |
£71,089 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.70 |
8.0 |
2.87 |
246350 |
£71,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy urban 2 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.93 |
6.0 |
1.50 |
51583 |
3108 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.09 |
6.0 |
1.88 |
44746 |
4780 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.09 |
6.0 |
1.88 |
44746 |
4522 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.05 |
6.0 |
1.90 |
46444 |
£4596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Medium urban |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.90 |
3.0 |
1.50 |
37978 |
2983 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.04 |
3.0 |
1.72 |
32981 |
£3978 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.04 |
3.0 |
1.72 |
32981 |
£4786 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.00 |
3.0 |
1.74 |
34359 |
£4849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marginal urban |
Current position (FDR) |
£1.02 |
5.0 |
1.00 |
31238 |
-£2,957 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.22 |
5.0 |
1.81 |
27476 |
-£540 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.22 |
5.0 |
1.81 |
27476 |
-£1,936 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.19 |
5.0 |
1.82 |
28228 |
-£1,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy interurban 1 |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.86 |
1.0 |
1.00 |
43812 |
£4,457 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.02 |
1.0 |
1.90 |
39225 |
£7,168 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.02 |
1.0 |
1.90 |
39225 |
£5,710 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.99 |
1.0 |
1.91 |
40563 |
£5,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Busy interurban 2 |
Current position (FDR) |
£1.23 |
2.0 |
1.00 |
67888 |
£26,299 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£1.45 |
2.0 |
2.40 |
62709 |
£33,410 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£1.45 |
2.0 |
2.40 |
62709 |
£29,428 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£1.43 |
2.0 |
2.41 |
64060 |
£29,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marginal interurban |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.82 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
59465 |
£1,223 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.94 |
2.0 |
2.01 |
51477 |
£2,459 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.94 |
2.0 |
2.01 |
51477 |
£1,602 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.90 |
2.0 |
2.03 |
53669 |
£1,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loss-making interurban |
Current position (FDR) |
£2.28 |
1.0 |
1.50 |
9334 |
-£3,989 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£2.68 |
1.0 |
1.64 |
7987 |
-£3,209 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£2.68 |
1.0 |
1.64 |
7987 |
-£7,110 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£2.66 |
1.0 |
1.65 |
8036 |
-£7,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rural |
Current position (FDR) |
£0.88 |
1.0 |
2.00 |
19206 |
£3,170 |
| FDR profit maximising |
£0.99 |
1.0 |
1.56 |
16393 |
£3,957 |
| Day 1 impact on profits |
£0.99 |
1.0 |
1.56 |
16393 |
£3,546 |
| IPP profit maximising |
£0.96 |
1.0 |
1.57 |
17091 |
£3,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ Previous ]
[ Contents ]
[ Next ]
|
| |
|
|
|